Mark 5:21 When Jesus had again crossed over by boat to the other
side of the lake, a large crowd gathered around him while he was by the lake. 22 Then one of the synagogue leaders,
named Jairus, came, and when he saw Jesus, he fell at his feet. 23 He pleaded earnestly with him,
"My little daughter is dying. Please come and put your hands on her so
that she will be healed and live." 24
So Jesus went with him. A large crowd followed and pressed around him. 25 And a woman was there who had been
subject to bleeding for twelve years. 26
She had suffered a great deal under the care of many doctors and had spent all
she had, yet instead of getting better she grew worse. 27 When she heard about Jesus, she came up behind him in the crowd
and touched his cloak, 28 because
she thought, "If I just touch his clothes, I will be healed." 29 Immediately her bleeding stopped
and she felt in her body that she was freed from her suffering. 30 At once Jesus realized that power
had gone out from him. He turned around in the crowd and asked, "Who
touched my clothes?" 31
"You see the people crowding against you," his disciples answered,
"and yet you can ask, 'Who touched me?' " 32 But Jesus kept looking around to see who had done it. 33 Then the woman, knowing what had
happened to her, came and fell at his feet and, trembling with fear, told him
the whole truth. 34 He said to
her, "Daughter, your faith has healed you. Go in peace and be freed from
your suffering." 35 While
Jesus was still speaking, some people came from the house of Jairus, the
synagogue leader. "Your daughter is dead," they said. "Why
bother the teacher anymore?" 36
Overhearing what they said, Jesus told him, "Don't be afraid; just
believe." 37 He did not let
anyone follow him except Peter, James and John the brother of James. 38 When they came to the home of the
synagogue leader, Jesus saw a commotion, with people crying and wailing loudly.
39 He went in and said to them,
"Why all this commotion and wailing? The child is not dead but
asleep." 40 But they
laughed at him. After he put them all out, he took the child's father and
mother and the disciples who were with him, and went in where the child was. 41 He took her by the hand and said to
her, ""Talitha koum!"" (which means "Little girl, I
say to you, get up!"). 42 Immediately
the girl stood up and began to walk around (she was twelve years old). At this
they were completely astonished. 43
He gave strict orders not to let anyone know about this, and told them to give
her something to eat.
This
passage represents another one of those well-known "Markan
Sandwiches," a story-within-a-story. It's the sort of thing that if it
only happened once in a Gospel.... no big deal. But in Mark's Gospel--the
shortest of all of the Gospels--at least one commentator counts NINE such
"sandwiches." That's well beyond coincidence, and whereas older
scholarship seemed to think of Mark the evangelist as somewhat disorganized or
easily distracted, newer scholarship has come to see this as a distinctive
literary device--not invented by Mark, but used brilliantly by him.
So,
all of that aside, what can we learn from this reading? Several things, no
doubt. For instance, consider Jesus the exemplar minister. On his way to
minister to Jairus, he's presented with an opportunity to minister to someone
else in need. When this happens to us, it's usually disconcerting; it's usually
troubling. We've already had to rearrange our schedule.... dinner is already
going to be late because we've decided to do a charitable deed.... an act of
Christian kindness for someone. What would happen if on the way to that act of
Christian service, a totally unplanned, spur of the moment scenario of need
should confront us? Would we seek to side-step it? "NOT NOW, NOT NOW, I'm
on my way to do a charitable deed somewhere else," might be our first
response. "Here's my card, call me tomorrow," .... or maybe we'd give
the person someone else's phone number...or worse yet, ignore them altogether.
Jesus, however, demonstrates an exemplar approach. He neither sidesteps the
interruption nor does he completely forget about his initial commitment to
help. In that sense, any of us who would seek to emulate the Lord in acts of
Christian service can learn from the Master. But what else is going on?
Surely
one of the functions of Mark's Sandwich of these two stories is to introduce an initial contrast....yet for
the sole purpose of ultimately blowing away all contrasts. Here's what I
mean: Take the man Jairus. First, he is
of course A MAN... which gives him an automatic higher standing within the
culture of the day. Not only is he a man, but he's the leader of the local
synagogue. This is a position of authority and prominence... and like all
positions of authority and prominence in this culture, it indicates that the
man himself is wealthy. True, Mark does not present Jairus as a man who is
trying to play off his wealth and position. He comes to Jesus and falls on his
knees (v22). Yet, a reader of the era would naturally suppose that OF COURSE a
holy man like Jesus would go and help THIS person.
Next,
take the unnamed woman. First, she's a woman...which in this culture
automatically means that her standing is FAR LESS than ANY man's, let alone a
man like Jairus. And, as mentioned, she's
not even named...which gives her even less standing in the narrative. Add
to that the fact that she's destitute. Evidently she had had means at one time,
but the story says she's exhausted all of her means in an attempt to find a
cure for her condition (v26). Finally, consider her particular malady, a continuous
menstrual flow that makes her ritually unclean; it limits both her movement and
acceptance within her culture. Jairus is a rich, healthy, man; she is a poor,
unhealthy/unclean woman. The term "polar opposites" comes to
mind....and here's where St. Mark
strikes! By hooking these two people/stories together, Mark is teaching us
some important truths about the universal need for Christ, and God's universal
love and outreach to all. There are IMMENSE DIFFERENCES between these two
people... yet Mark is, in essence saying, ....there's no difference between these two people. Concepts such as
this may seem like no-brainers to us in our egalitarian "class-less"
culture, but we need to remember that the idea that "all men [sic]
are created equal" is an extremely recent blip on the radar screen of
history. In Mark's day the idea that there is NO DIFFERENCE between Jairus and
the unnamed woman would've been radical.
Of
course, that's part of the "good-news-ness" of Mark's gospel. The
Christ has come. And he hasn't just come for rich and powerful men; he's come
for all! The old spiritual "The Ground Is Level At The Foot Of The
Cross" comes to mind.
Cheers,
TM