About Me...what is an 'evangelical-catholic?'

Elk Grove Village, IL, United States
I was born & raised in rural mid-Michigan (M-go blue!). Life & work have taken me to many different places. God has too, as I've come to learn that faith is a pilgrimage. I very much resonate with the label 'EVANGELICAL-CATHOLIC.' I was raised Baptist, but found myself drawn to the Sacraments & Liturgy of the Church. I appreciate very much the words of the Augsburg Confession: "...nothing has been received among us, in doctrine or in ceremonies, that is contrary to Scripture or to the church catholic." Evangelical-catholic is a term of self-designation used by Christians coming from a broad spectrum of theological perspectives and commitments, ranging from Lutherans, Anglicans, and various Evangelicals yearning for greater catholicity .....to faithful Roman Catholics longing for an evangelical renewal of the Church. Perhaps beneath the apparent denominational differences there lies a common...groaning of the Spirit of God, who is seeking to draw the members of Christ’s mystical body into a communal life that is both fully catholic and fully evangelical. One can always hope and pray!

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Thoughts going in, Sun Sept 30th


Mark 9:38 "Teacher," said John, "we saw someone driving out demons in your name and we told him to stop, because he was not one of us." 39 "Do not stop him," Jesus said. "No one who does a miracle in my name can in the next moment say anything bad about me, 40 for whoever is not against us is for us. 41 Truly I tell you, anyone who gives you a cup of water in my name because you belong to the Messiah will certainly be rewarded. 42 "If anyone causes one of these little ones--those who believe in me--to stumble, it would be better for them if a large millstone were hung around their neck and they were thrown into the sea. 43 If your hand causes you to stumble, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life maimed than with two hands to go into hell, where the fire never goes out. 45 And if your foot causes you to stumble, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life crippled than to have two feet and be thrown into hell. 47 And if your eye causes you to stumble, pluck it out. It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into hell, 48 where " 'their worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched.' 49 Everyone will be salted with fire. 50 "Salt is good, but if it loses its saltiness, how can you make it salty again? Have salt in yourselves, and be at peace with each other."

            The reading this week picks right up where we left off in Mark from last week. Just about all commentators note that this reading seems to have 3 main divisions:  (1) The ministerial 'success' of someone outside of the core group of Disciples; (2) the teaching on causing another to stumble (Gk, skandalise); and (3) the teaching on guarding one's self from stumbling. While these oracles from Jesus may initially appear not to have a lot in common, from my reading of the text it seems possible to discern at least two common denominators.
            COMMON DENOMINATOR #1 has to do with what I would call the earnestness of the message. Who Jesus is, why he came, and what he's all about is so serious, that it trumps everything. The fact that there is someone else out there performing exorcisms in his name is much more important than the fact that he's not part of the inner circle. A cup of water may seem like a minor thing, but when given in the loving name of the Savior it becomes a major thing... etc. etc.
            COMMON DENOMINATOR #2 has to do with the idea of stumbling. In a lot of ways the direct English translation of the Gk skandalizo as 'to cause to stumble' amounts to a pretty weak rendering. You or I stumble all the time and usually we catch ourselves and keep going with no problem. The idea behind skandalizo seems to be much more serious, however. Other English translations at least attempt to wrestle with this word. The Good News and God's Word translations, for instance, render it as "to sin." Vs 42, then, would read: whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin...  That's not bad. I think the HCS translation probably comes closest, however, when it says: whoever causes the downfall of one of these little ones...  The point is that skandalizo causes the wreck & ruin of someone or some thing. It's a train wreck; it's a disaster; it's not something one recovers from, or at least not easily. The point that Jesus seems to be making in discussing skandalizo is that it is a complimentary idea to the first point on the seriousness/earnestness of the message. The message is so serious, so timely, so needed, so urgent, that one dare not cause the ruination of someone doing good in the name of Jesus even if he is an outsider; one dare not cause the ruination of "little ones" who believe (ether literally children, or those who are young in The Faith); and lastly, one dare not let anything cause one's own ruination. To be skandalized is not a trivial matter; it's not even a simple matter of committing "a sin,".... it is really nothing short of being driven outside of the fellowship of Jesus. It is the loss of everything! That's why Jesus brings it down to brass tacks at the end when he constantly contrasts entering the Kingdom of God vs entering Hell.
            From an application perspective, the passage should give us pause. It's one thing that our words and/or actions may have an impact on our own belief etc., and it is certainly a lot to ponder in terms of our own faith walk. However, Jesus broadens the scope. Not only can our words and actions influence others for good (giving them a cup of water in the name of Christ, etc.)..... but turns out, our words and actions can also have the opposite impact.
            A few years back I read a fascinating little book entitled: I'm fine with God, it's Christians I can't stand. The author's point was that he had sadly encountered many believers who presented a 'message' that portrayed God as hateful, vengeful, etc. etc. and entirely devoid of any Gospel. How many people have you encountered that have said something along that line? People who say they want nothing to do with the Christian God because of their experience with Christians? They have been 'skandalized.'


cheers,

TM

No comments: