About Me...what is an 'evangelical-catholic?'

Elk Grove Village, IL, United States
I was born & raised in rural mid-Michigan (M-go blue!). Life & work have taken me to many different places. God has too, as I've come to learn that faith is a pilgrimage. I very much resonate with the label 'EVANGELICAL-CATHOLIC.' I was raised Baptist, but found myself drawn to the Sacraments & Liturgy of the Church. I appreciate very much the words of the Augsburg Confession: "...nothing has been received among us, in doctrine or in ceremonies, that is contrary to Scripture or to the church catholic." Evangelical-catholic is a term of self-designation used by Christians coming from a broad spectrum of theological perspectives and commitments, ranging from Lutherans, Anglicans, and various Evangelicals yearning for greater catholicity .....to faithful Roman Catholics longing for an evangelical renewal of the Church. Perhaps beneath the apparent denominational differences there lies a common...groaning of the Spirit of God, who is seeking to draw the members of Christ’s mystical body into a communal life that is both fully catholic and fully evangelical. One can always hope and pray!

Thursday, February 7, 2013

Thoughts going in, Sunday Feb 10th



Luke 9:28 About eight days after Jesus said this, he took Peter, John and James with him and went up onto a mountain to pray. 29 As he was praying, the appearance of his face changed, and his clothes became as bright as a flash of lightning. 30 Two men, Moses and Elijah, 31 appeared in glorious splendor, talking with Jesus. They spoke about his departure, which he was about to bring to fulfillment at Jerusalem. 32 Peter and his companions were very sleepy, but when they became fully awake, they saw his glory and the two men standing with him. 33 As the men were leaving Jesus, Peter said to him, "Master, it is good for us to be here. Let us put up three shelters--one for you, one for Moses and one for Elijah." (He did not know what he was saying.) 34 While he was speaking, a cloud appeared and covered them, and they were afraid as they entered the cloud. 35 A voice came from the cloud, saying, "This is my Son, whom I have chosen; listen to him." 36 When the voice had spoken, they found that Jesus was alone. The disciples kept this to themselves and did not tell anyone at that time what they had seen.

            As can be readily gathered from the text, this Sunday is Transfiguration Sunday. For the preacher, it's the sort of Sunday that is on the one hand quite easy in terms of planning, and on the other hand entails some difficulty.
            It is easy in the sense that one needn't spend much time mulling over which text to preach on. It's obvious. Transfiguration Sunday means preaching on the Gospel text, even for those who don't already observe the custom of regular Gospel-text sermons. A lot can also be made at the "atmospheric level." We are getting ready to say goodbye to the Sundays after Epiphany. In a few short days Ash Wednesday will be here and we will be in Lent. That is a major mood change. Liturgically, having a Sunday with a set theme like Transfiguration Sunday functions as a 'bridge' between the two seasons and their vast differences in terms of focus.
            The tricky part is that the story is so familiar. We hit it every year as we pass from Epiphany Sundays to Lent. Even on the three year lectionary with the built in differences between the individual Gospels, the nuts and bolts of the story are always the same: Jesus, Peter, James and John are on the mountain. Jesus is joined by Moses and Elijah. They're conversing, but the exact content of their discussion is not revealed. Jesus is 'altered' in some way in his appearance. Peter wants to build 3 'booths'... one for each of the holy figures. The voice says this is my beloved son, etc. In the end, nine out of ten times the sermon becomes something about "mountain top experiences" and how they're sure nice when they happen, but they can't be preserved; there's work to get on with down off that mountain. That's even the flow of one of the most beloved hymns of the hymnal "Tis Good Lord to be Here."
            One somewhat interesting approach is to come at each of the Gospel versions within the context of their own sitz em leben ... the circumstances surrounding the context of their writing. In the case of Luke--an extremely Gentile-friendly Gospel--it has been noted by boatloads of scholars that a primary concern of Luke's Gospel is to show the Empire that the message of Jesus of Nazareth is not a threat. Jesus and his disciples may have started out as Palestinian Jews, but unlike the Zealots and young rabble rousers of mid 60s AD Palestine, they did not preach open revolt against Rome. Furthermore, many pious Jews accepted Jesus and his kingdom not of this world, but the Jewish leadership as a whole did not. In terms of continued relevance in God's unfolding plan for the world, therefore, a Judaism without Jesus, would be no longer relevant. (very politically incorrect to say these days, but that is most certainly the point of much of the New Testament narrative).
            And so with this in mind, what does one find when approaching Luke's Transfiguration account? We find Jesus atop a mountain with two of the Old Testament's greatest mountain top heroes, Moses (Mt. Sinai) and Elijah (Mt. Carmel). Moses talked to God face to face and received the Torah from him. Moses was the hand-picked captain to lead the Exodus of God's people from slavery to redemption (note: they were not led from slavery to freedom; they switched masters from evil/oppressive Pharaoh to their Redeemer loving/gracious Yahweh). And then Elijah atop his mountain exercised perfect faith/obedience to Yahweh; vastly outnumbered... and with everyone against him from the king on down (remember Ahab and Jezebel?) Elijah prayed fire down from heaven and then slew the false prophets of Baal. In terms of MOUNTAIN TOP HEROES, they didn't get any better than Moses & Elijah. In terms of collecting "hero trading cards" everyone would want a Moses & Elijah card. They were the Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig of the Old Testament.
            So what does that mean for Luke? Here are these two great figures of Israelite lore standing WITH JESUS. They're talking with him, but they are not arguing or jousting with him like the Pharisees; they're not clamoring for his death like the Chief Priest and Sanhedrin; and they're not shouting "crucify him, crucify him" like the unruly Jerusalem mob. They are there to 'endorse' him; they are there to say, in effect, your mountain top experience, especially your eventual one atop Mt. Calvary, will eclipse ours. What ours was about was a mere shadow of what you're here to do.
            And as the story unfolds, it's nice that Peter would like to build a booth for all three--Moses, Elijah, and Jesus--but in the end such honorific thinking mistakenly puts all three on the same footing. Two things set that record straight: the heavenly voice commands that we listen to the beloved son; listen to him as perfect expositor of EVERYTHING that Moses and Elijah were about, but listen to him alone (not the other rabbis, not the tradition of the elders, etc. etc.). The other salient matter is that in the end, Moses and Elijah disappear, leaving only Christ. This is not to say that the Old Testament is no longer relevant, but it is to say that the whole epoch has its culmination and fulfillment in Christ. There is no such thing as a legitimate understanding of Moses & Elijah apart from Jesus.
            One last observation on the command listen to him. Typically we like to listen to winners. Listen to General Patton because he's a battle-hardened winner. Listen to George Halas because he's a winner. Listen to EF Hutton because he's a winner. As disciples of Jesus, we are told to listen to the one who preached forgiveness, not retribution; listen to the one who said pray for our enemies; listen to the one who said we can't serve two masters, God and money; listen to the one who willingly left his mountain top of glory for a mountain top of universal service for others. It sorta redefines God's view of 'winning.'

Cheers,

TM



No comments: