About Me...what is an 'evangelical-catholic?'

Elk Grove Village, IL, United States
I was born & raised in rural mid-Michigan (M-go blue!). Life & work have taken me to many different places. God has too, as I've come to learn that faith is a pilgrimage. I very much resonate with the label 'EVANGELICAL-CATHOLIC.' I was raised Baptist, but found myself drawn to the Sacraments & Liturgy of the Church. I appreciate very much the words of the Augsburg Confession: "...nothing has been received among us, in doctrine or in ceremonies, that is contrary to Scripture or to the church catholic." Evangelical-catholic is a term of self-designation used by Christians coming from a broad spectrum of theological perspectives and commitments, ranging from Lutherans, Anglicans, and various Evangelicals yearning for greater catholicity .....to faithful Roman Catholics longing for an evangelical renewal of the Church. Perhaps beneath the apparent denominational differences there lies a common...groaning of the Spirit of God, who is seeking to draw the members of Christ’s mystical body into a communal life that is both fully catholic and fully evangelical. One can always hope and pray!

Friday, January 2, 2015

Thoughts going in, January 4th, Christmas +2

John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 4 In him was life, and that life was the light of all people. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it. 6 There was a man sent from God whose name was John. 7 He came as a witness to testify concerning that light, so that through him all might believe. 8 He himself was not the light; he came only as a witness to the light. 9 The true light that gives light to everyone was coming into the world. 10 He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him. 11 He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 12 Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God-- 13 children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God. 14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only [Son], who came from the Father, full of grace and truth. 15 (John testified concerning him. He cried out, saying, "This is he of whom I said, 'He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.' ") 16 Out of his fullness we have all received grace in place of grace already given. 17 For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. 18 No one has ever seen God, but the one and only [Son], who is himself God and is in closest relationship with the Father, has made him known.

            One of the fascinating ways in which the four Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John differ is in their handling of the 'origin' of Jesus. Going with what we have--a received text--scholars down through the years have bantered back and forth about what we *think we can know. For instance, if Mark was the **only** Gospel we had, it would be much more difficult not to hold to "adoptionist" Christology. The old false teaching of Adoptionism held that Jesus was a normal man, born the son of Mary and Joseph... of humble, yet royal lineage; and at his baptism by John in the Jordan, God was so 'impressed' with Jesus that a divine 'adoption' took place. Given that many scholars hold that Mark was the first Gospel written, it's easy to see how both Matthew and Luke could see themselves as 'correctives.' BOTH include infancy narratives, complete with angels and divine announcements as to the uniqueness of Jesus; his divine fatherhood, and Mary's virginity.
            And then John comes along. And even saying it that way... implies that John was the last of the four to be written--an old higher critical position, to be sure, but these days there is no consensus on where John belongs in the chronology of Gospel composition. Perhaps one indication that John not only comes after Mark, Matthew and Luke, but is familiar with their content... is that he moves his starting point back even further. He begins not at the Jordan River where John came baptizing, and not even in the days when Caesar Augustus ruled the known world; He begins at the BEGINNING: 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. And while he is using somewhat cryptic phraseology (scholars tend to think that these early verses of John--known as his 'prologue' were an ancient HYMN to Jesus that the writer borrowed and used to begin his Gospel), the identity of this "Word" from 1:1 becomes clearly known to us in vs 14: The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only [Son], who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
            "Creation symbols" are big in John's Gospel. New scholarship has revitalized the understanding of the "Jewishness" of this writing. One of the ways we see this is in the constant mention of "light" and, of course, the way John begins his story In the beginning is a direct reference back to the opening of Genesis.
            In other words, John--in part--sees himself as writing a new Genesis. The old Genesis was about God's loving act of creation, but the story didn't end well; creation's perfection was marred by sin. This new story of Genesis, however, is different. It too is a loving act on the part of the Creator, but it ends PERFECTLY. Just as in the old story, the Creator takes the initiative; his Word opts not to remain in Heaven, but to spring forth with creative energy and activity; to come to his creation; to even take on flesh (an ultimate fulfillment of Gen. 3:8); to have his glory made known to all creation--which is not to say that he went around doing miracles (glorious as they may be), but that he revealed his ultimate glory on the cross as he shed his own blood as sin-bearer for the entire world.
            This week's Sundays & Season's introductory remarks for the second Sunday after Christmas state: Within the gospel reading’s profound words lies the simple message that God is revealed in a human person. Though we may try to understand how the Word existed with God from the beginning of time, the wonder we celebrate at Christmas is that the Word continues to dwell among us. Christ comes among us in the gathered assembly, the scriptures, the waters of new birth, and the bread and the wine. Through these ordinary gifts we receive the fullness of God’s grace and truth. And this really gets to the heart of John's message and the "Christmas-ness" of this reading. Because even without a humble virgin mother, or angelic announcement, or a wise husband-to-be who consents to be a part of this divine drama, John 1:1-18 is a wonderful Christmas message. Verses 12-13 even use the language of 'gift reception:'  Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God-- 13 children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God.

Cheers,


T.M.

No comments: