About Me...what is an 'evangelical-catholic?'

Elk Grove Village, IL, United States
I was born & raised in rural mid-Michigan (M-go blue!). Life & work have taken me to many different places. God has too, as I've come to learn that faith is a pilgrimage. I very much resonate with the label 'EVANGELICAL-CATHOLIC.' I was raised Baptist, but found myself drawn to the Sacraments & Liturgy of the Church. I appreciate very much the words of the Augsburg Confession: "...nothing has been received among us, in doctrine or in ceremonies, that is contrary to Scripture or to the church catholic." Evangelical-catholic is a term of self-designation used by Christians coming from a broad spectrum of theological perspectives and commitments, ranging from Lutherans, Anglicans, and various Evangelicals yearning for greater catholicity .....to faithful Roman Catholics longing for an evangelical renewal of the Church. Perhaps beneath the apparent denominational differences there lies a common...groaning of the Spirit of God, who is seeking to draw the members of Christ’s mystical body into a communal life that is both fully catholic and fully evangelical. One can always hope and pray!

Thursday, July 30, 2015

Pentecost +10, thoughts going in, Sunday August 2nd 2015

2Samuel 11:26-12:13a: When Uriah's wife heard that her husband was dead, she mourned for him. 27 After the time of mourning was over, David had her brought to his house, and she became his wife and bore him a son. But the thing David had done displeased the LORD. 1 The LORD sent Nathan to David. When he came to him, he said, "There were two men in a certain town, one rich and the other poor. 2 The rich man had a very large number of sheep and cattle, 3 but the poor man had nothing except one little ewe lamb he had bought. He raised it, and it grew up with him and his children. It shared his food, drank from his cup and even slept in his arms. It was like a daughter to him. 4 "Now a traveler came to the rich man, but the rich man refrained from taking one of his own sheep or cattle to prepare a meal for the traveler who had come to him. Instead, he took the ewe lamb that belonged to the poor man and prepared it for the one who had come to him." 5 David burned with anger against the man and said to Nathan, "As surely as the LORD lives, the man who did this must die! 6 He must pay for that lamb four times over, because he did such a thing and had no pity." 7 Then Nathan said to David, "You are the man! This is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says: 'I anointed you king over Israel, and I delivered you from the hand of Saul. 8 I gave your master's house to you, and your master's wives into your arms. I gave you the house of Israel and Judah. And if all this had been too little, I would have given you even more. 9 Why did you despise the word of the LORD by doing what is evil in his eyes? You struck down Uriah the Hittite with the sword and took his wife to be your own. You killed him with the sword of the Ammonites. 10 Now, therefore, the sword will never depart from your house, because you despised me and took the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be your own.' 11 "This is what the LORD says: 'Out of your own household I am going to bring calamity on you. Before your very eyes I will take your wives and give them to one who is close to you, and he will sleep with your wives in broad daylight. 12 You did it in secret, but I will do this thing in broad daylight before all Israel.' " 13 Then David said to Nathan, "I have sinned against the LORD."

            The David Saga continues this week with Part 9, the conclusion of the David & Bathsheba story. From what we read last week, right up until 11:27a... everything seems to be going David's way, but in 11:27b we read the ominous words: But the thing David had done displeased the LORD.
            Chapter 12 continues the story now with the prophet Nathan's appearance in the royal court. Commentators are split as to whether Nathan was setting this meeting up to look like a typical juridical function or not. Ancient kings of all lands were, among other things, the final arbiter of justice in the land, and a routine part of the job was to hear and decide cases. If Nathan intended this meeting to sound like such a case, he wasn't beginning with very many specifics: both men were unnamed, their tribe or where they lived wasn't mentioned, etc. In the end, these are trivial matters, given that in reality Nathan was setting David up. In that sense, what he had composed was a juridical 'parable.' From vs 5-6, it's obvious that Nathan had his man: David burned with anger against the man and said to Nathan, "As surely as the LORD lives, the man who did this must die! 6 He must pay for that lamb four times over, because he did such a thing and had no pity." There's an interesting lesson here. Often when we succumb to sin, we either rationalize our choices or we somehow are able to disconnect ourselves from our own moral compass. By decontextualizing the Uriah episode and placing the essence of what happened into a seemingly unrelated parable, Nathan helped David rediscover his moral compass.
            But the problem David experienced by rediscovering his own moral compass was illustrated in the next statement from Nathan:  Thou art the man! (the words sound so much more ominous in the KJV). David stood self-condemned.
            Commentators rightly point out that the indictment parable that Nathan uses against David is essentially about the abuse of power for one's own enrichment at the expense of the helpless. The writings of the prophets--in particular Amos--develop this theme at length. But it's important not to lose sight of the extent of David's crime. YES he abused his power to achieve his own ends at the expense of the helpless. But in so doing, he murdered a man. Nathan mentions this fact twice: You struck down Uriah the Hittite with the sword and You killed him with the sword of the Ammonites (v9). This is a great evil. Saul disobeyed the word of the Lord in battle commands. David disobeyed the word of the Lord by breaking the FIFTH COMMANDMENT.
            The one thing David does right in this whole narrative is that he immediately repents. He doesn't try to deny it; he doesn't equivocate; he doesn't throw Nathan out of the palace and continue on... he repents:  Then David said to Nathan, "I have sinned against the LORD." (v13). One commentator cited a tradition from medieval synagogues that, in printed manuscripts, intentionally left a space between v13a and the rest of the verse... the implication being that one would turn immediately from 13a to Psalm 51, the great penitential Psalm of David.
            This is a "sin boldly" moment--you know, Luther's famous quote so often taken out of context. Be a sinner, and sin boldly, but believe and rejoice in Christ even more boldly. In David's life, the fullness of time had not yet come; Christ was yet to be born. Yet, David could still repent, believe and rejoice that even though his sin would have consequences, God was a forgiving God.

Cheers,

T.M.



No comments: