About Me...what is an 'evangelical-catholic?'

Elk Grove Village, IL, United States
I was born & raised in rural mid-Michigan (M-go blue!). Life & work have taken me to many different places. God has too, as I've come to learn that faith is a pilgrimage. I very much resonate with the label 'EVANGELICAL-CATHOLIC.' I was raised Baptist, but found myself drawn to the Sacraments & Liturgy of the Church. I appreciate very much the words of the Augsburg Confession: "...nothing has been received among us, in doctrine or in ceremonies, that is contrary to Scripture or to the church catholic." Evangelical-catholic is a term of self-designation used by Christians coming from a broad spectrum of theological perspectives and commitments, ranging from Lutherans, Anglicans, and various Evangelicals yearning for greater catholicity .....to faithful Roman Catholics longing for an evangelical renewal of the Church. Perhaps beneath the apparent denominational differences there lies a common...groaning of the Spirit of God, who is seeking to draw the members of Christ’s mystical body into a communal life that is both fully catholic and fully evangelical. One can always hope and pray!

Thursday, June 20, 2013

Thoughts going in, Sunday June 23


Gal 3: 23 Before the coming of this faith, we were held in custody under the law, locked up until the faith that was to come would be revealed. 24 So the law was put in charge of us until Christ came that we might be justified by faith. 25 Now that this faith has come, we are no longer under the supervision of the law. 26 So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, 27 for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
Supposedly, you “can’t have your cake and eat it too.” We’ve all heard that expression before. According to wiki it’s an English bit of folk wisdom dating back to the time of Cromwell. I bring up the phrase because it seems to me in various (heavy) places of St. Paul’s writings, he is walking an extremely fine line, wanting…. in essence… to have his cake and eat it too.
Specifically, St. Paul wants to uphold the worth, validity, and sanctity of the Torah. It is, after all, God’s holy word, the 1st 5 books of the Bible. If Torah itself were worthless, it would need to be ripped from the Bible. Paul would never think such a thing. Not only that, but Paul would never think in what would later become a distinctively Lutheran caricature of “law vs gospel” = “Old Testament = Law = bad….New Testament = Gospel = good.” I’ve actually encountered well-meaning people who mistakenly suppose that if the sermon is from the Old Testament, the pastor hasn’t preached “any gospel” to them. This is horrifically untrue. Even if ALL we had were the 1st 5 books of the Bible, we may not know anything of Christ specifically, but we would most assuredly know of God’s grace and the gospel call to trust in his mercy for the forgiveness of sins.
Yet, while Paul wants to uphold the worth, validity, and sanctity of the Torah, he also very much wants to uphold what the Torah cannot do. In short, the Torah cannot do anything that Jesus did. According to the gospel of John, the word became flesh and dwelt among us. Building on that point, the word must become flesh. The Law cannot humble itself to be born of a virgin; the Law cannot embrace the sinful and unworthy; the Law cannot share a meal with the undeserving; and most importantly of all, the Law cannot shed its blood for the sins of the world. There are just some things the Law cannot do.
The difficulty with this passage of Galatians continues to be the same thing we’ve encountered all along, namely, what does that situation and all of Paul’s well-developed rhetoric have to do with us today? No one is maintaining that Torah observance is necessary for salvation. Nor is the caricature true… which is to say, no one is teaching that salvation is based on our good works, or based on not doing bad things.
With that in mind, I think one of the cool things that can be preached from this passage has to do with the great POWER of baptism. Barclay & other scholars have pointed out that in Paul’s day a very common Jewish prayer went as follows: (prayed by a man, of course) it thanks God that “Thou has not made me a Gentile, a slave, or a woman.” Clearly the prayer invests all of one’s standing before God in the fact that one is Jewish, free, and male. Paul’s point is that such sentiments are meaningless. One’s standing before God isn’t based on this. One’s standing before God is based solely on being clothed with Christ (v27)…a mystical, yet real reality that occurs at baptism. For those who wonder if a simple ritual accompanied by a few words can really do anything, this verse is a powerful truth!

Cheers,

TM

No comments: