About Me...what is an 'evangelical-catholic?'

Elk Grove Village, IL, United States
I was born & raised in rural mid-Michigan (M-go blue!). Life & work have taken me to many different places. God has too, as I've come to learn that faith is a pilgrimage. I very much resonate with the label 'EVANGELICAL-CATHOLIC.' I was raised Baptist, but found myself drawn to the Sacraments & Liturgy of the Church. I appreciate very much the words of the Augsburg Confession: "...nothing has been received among us, in doctrine or in ceremonies, that is contrary to Scripture or to the church catholic." Evangelical-catholic is a term of self-designation used by Christians coming from a broad spectrum of theological perspectives and commitments, ranging from Lutherans, Anglicans, and various Evangelicals yearning for greater catholicity .....to faithful Roman Catholics longing for an evangelical renewal of the Church. Perhaps beneath the apparent denominational differences there lies a common...groaning of the Spirit of God, who is seeking to draw the members of Christ’s mystical body into a communal life that is both fully catholic and fully evangelical. One can always hope and pray!

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Thoughts going in, Sunday June 30th


Gal 5:1 It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery. 13 You, my brothers and sisters, were called to be free. But do not use your freedom to indulge the sinful nature; rather, serve one another humbly in love. 14 For the entire law is fulfilled in keeping this one command: "Love your neighbor as yourself." 15 If you keep on biting and devouring each other, watch out or you will be destroyed by each other. 16 So I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the sinful nature. 17 For the sinful nature desires what is contrary to the Spirit, and the Spirit what is contrary to the sinful nature. They are in conflict with each other, so that you are not to do whatever you want. 18 But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law. 19 The acts of the sinful nature are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery; 20 idolatry and witchcraft; hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions 21 and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God. 22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23 gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law. 24 Those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the sinful nature with its passions and desires. 25 Since we live by the Spirit, let us keep in step with the Spirit. 26 Let us not become conceited, provoking and envying each other.

Commentators one and all point out that it is in chapter 5 that St. Paul begins the ‘ethical’ section of his letter. By ‘ethical,’ what they mean is the “so what?” part. In other words, up to this point Paul has basically been identifying a theological problem, and—in his own way—doing his best to offer correction. NOW, he is getting down to the difference it should all make at ground level.
The freedom vs slavery imagery that is used in vss 1 and 13 are images that tend not to hit us in quite the same way the first readers would have been hit. For us freedom tends to mean the ability to do whatever we want, whereas slavery is thought of as being trapped—in a job or career we loathe, or in a relationship that’s gone sour; or in a house or car that is worth less than what we owe. It’s easy for us to forget that for 90% or more of human history some people OWNED other people. The audio book I’m currently enjoying is set in early imperial Rome, the era St. Paul lived in. In the story a slave killed his master. This was horrifically bad news for all slaves in that household, for Roman law dictated that in such a case ALL of the dead master’s slaves were to be executed (crucified). The intent was to send a horribly brutal message of deterrent. A “freed” person in Paul’s era knew precisely what it meant to be enslaved, and once freed, would never contemplate returning to slavery. Paul’s point to the Galatian Christians is that freedom from religiously legalistic expectations is precisely what they’ve been given in Christ; to revert to religious legalism would be like the freed man returning to slavery.
At the practical level, however, Paul always finds himself walking a tightrope… and the tightrope is this: “If I have been so liberated,” one may say, “and if God has so much grace to freely shower upon me, then I can do anything I want!” (cue the voice of Homer Simpson: “Wu-hooooooooo!”). This would be a very apt misinterpretation of last week’s emphasis that nothing matters in the eyes of God outside of baptism.
To this ultra-libertine notion (often called ‘antinomianism) Paul offers the corrective of the above verses. One does not have to work for one’s salvation. The work has been fully accomplished by Christ. One who is saved, however, has the Spirit of God indwelling their lives… and this fact cannot help but produce a difference. I don’t often read Max Lucado, but I like what he has to say about the indwelling activity of the Spirit. He says:
“Most Christians find the cross of Christ easier to accept than the Spirit of Christ. [concerning the Spirit] we grow quickly quiet and cautious, fearing what we can’t see or explain. It helps to consider the Spirit’s work from this angle: what Jesus did in Galilee is what the Holy Spirit does in us. Jesus dwelt among the people, teaching, comforting, and convicting. The Holy Spirit dwells within us, teaching, comforting and convicting.
So, adding Lucado’s spin to what Paul is saying, the freedom the Christian has been given is the freedom of being released from a slave labor camp where the person spends his days in endless labor, to enjoy a scenario of personal relationship and fellowship with God. But when this relationship and fellowship occurs, FRUIT NATURALLY GROWS. (vss 22-23). I like how one commentator puts it, “The contrast between works and fruit is important. A machine in a factory works and turns out a product, but it could never manufacture fruit. Fruit must grow out of life, and in the case of the believer, it is the life of the Spirit.” He sums up by saying: “We must remember that this fruit [of the Spirit] is produced to be eaten, not admired and put on display. People around us are starving for love, joy, peace, and all of the other graces of the Spirit. When they find them in our lives, they know that we have something they lack. We do not bear fruit for our own consumption; we bear fruit that others might be fed and helped, and that Christ might be glorified.

Cheers,

TM

No comments: